28 December 2016

Counter party codes

 


these are the counterparty codes on trade done. If you buy and fund sell to you, there is a chance for the day the share price may come down further as some funds are offloading. Vice versa if you are selling and fund buy from you, funds are buying while you are selling. So if you have any trade done you can share too so it can complement other users on their analysis be it technical or fundamental. There is no such thing as if fund sell mean it will be 100% down just that knowing what the big boys are doing may give you an edge. Do note some funds buy while some fund sells so the price still remain stable.

23 December 2016

Happy Holidays!

It has been a while since I logged in and post something that is non-shares related. This blog is linked to my email account and it will automatically get (most) of the emails that I send to my clients. Well due to filtering purposes, there will be some delays.

I have been busy settling and helping out with a SAFRA seminar that will be held on 25th February 2017. More details will be furnished at a closer time.

Also, it is the year end and there are not much research reports published.

Looking forward to next year, happy holidays everyone.

15 December 2016

FOMC Press Conference, December 14, 2016

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in November indicates that the labor market has continued to strengthen and that economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace since mid-year. Job gains have been solid in recent months and the unemployment rate has declined. Household spending has been rising moderately but business fixed investment has remained soft. Inflation has increased since earlier this year but is still below the Committee's 2 percent longer-run objective, partly reflecting earlier declines in energy prices and in prices of non-energy imports. Market-based measures of inflation compensation have moved up considerably but still are low; most survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed, on balance, in recent months.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects that, with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market conditions will strengthen somewhat further. Inflation is expected to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the transitory effects of past declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor market strengthens further. Near-term risks to the economic outlook appear roughly balanced. The Committee continues to closely monitor inflation indicators and global economic and financial developments.

In view of realized and expected labor market conditions and inflation, the Committee decided to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to 1/2 to 3/4 percent. The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting some further strengthening in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation.
In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. In light of the current shortfall of inflation from 2 percent, the Committee will carefully monitor actual and expected progress toward its inflation goal. The Committee expects that economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate; the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time, below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run. However, the actual path of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.
The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction, and it anticipates doing so until normalization of the level of the federal funds rate is well under way. This policy, by keeping the Committee's holdings of longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative financial conditions.



Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Janet L. Yellen, Chair; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Lael Brainard; James Bullard; Stanley Fischer; Esther L. George; Loretta J. Mester; Jerome H. Powell; Eric Rosengren; and Daniel K. Tarullo.

08 December 2016

Did YOU buy Parkson previously? Congrats to my clients who followed on 02/12







Technical Analysis

  1. Break out volume on 07/12/16, up from 0.123
  2. MACD indicates a buy indication
  3. Currently at 25 days moving average
  4. Short term target at 0.140 first. then 0.150

Fundamental Analysis

Please refer to my post on 02/12/16 HERE

06 December 2016

SP: Global Logistic Properties (GLP SP) : Strategic Review Of Business Options

Global Logistic Properties (GLP SP)   BUY

Strategic Review of Business Options


What’s New?
  • Undertaking strategic review of options for its business upon GIC's request. GLP announced last night that following GIC's request, it has appointed J.P Morgan as its financial adviser to make preliminary approaches to various parties on viable business options as part of the review. GLP's announcement was prompted by Bloomberg, which reported that JPMorgan was tapped by GLP to carry out a review after attracting takeover interest from a consortium of investors (China investment Corp, Hopu Investment and Hillhouse Capital).
  • GLP, however, has stated that no definitive transaction has been entered into with any party (including the consortium mentioned by Bloomberg) just yet. As such, no assurance can be made on a transaction materialising from the strategic review.
Our Take
  • A takeover bid would be unsurprising given GLP's compelling valuations, trading at 33% discount to our RNAV of S$3.06. Additionally,  long-term investors would likely be viewing the scalability of the fund management business over the next 5-10 years, which in our opinion, could expand valuations to S$4.25 (Initiation Report). We also note major shareholder GIC’s recent solo S$3.7b purchase of a European warehouse portfolio, which  could have resulted in GLP being a leading warehouse player in Europe if it had participated in the deal (GLP’s CEO Ming Z Mei has repeatedly expressed his interest in Europe). GIC (37% stake in GLP) deciding to forge ahead with the Europe acquisition without GLP, could hint at other corporate strategies supplanting further geographic diversification.
  • Alleged Chinese government curbs  on overseas investment.. A separate document seen by the South China Morning Post said to be the minutes of a central bank meeting on cross-border capital controls, said that from now until September of next year, Beijing would ban: deals involving investment of more than US$10 billion; mergers and acquisitions valued at more than US$1 billion outside a Chinese investor’s core business; and foreign real estate deals by state-owned enterprises involving more than US$1 billion.
  • ..Though impact on a potential privatisation is unclear. While the abovementioned investor consortium include Chinese firms like China Investment Corp (SOE firm)  and Hopu, we note that the Chinese government could be less inclined to view the potential privatisation as a "foreign investment". As China logistics assets form 56% of GLP's NAV, the Chinese authorities could see GLP's potential privatisation as a strategic move for further control of domestic assets (both CIC and Hopu are either partners in GLP's fund management business or hold a significant stake in its China assets).
Valuation. We have a BUY recommendation on GLP  with a target price S$2.40, pegged to a  22% discount to our RNAV of S$3.06.
Bloomberg's Reported Potential Consortium Investors







Relationship with GLP
Hillhouse Capital Management 8% stake in GLP
China Investment Corp Partner in GLP Japan Income Partners I and GLP Brazil Income Partners I
Hopu Investment Management Part of China Consortium (31% stake in GLP’s China assets)

source: Bloomberg, UOB KH

This transmission has been issued by a member of the UOB Kay Hian Group for the information of the addressee only and should not be reproduced and/or distributed to any other person. Each page attached hereto must be read in conjunction with any disclaimer which forms part of it. Unless otherwise stated, this transmission is neither an offer nor the solicitation of an offer to sell or purchase any investment. Its comments are based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but UOB Kay Hian Group makes no representations and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its completeness or accuracy.





02 December 2016

60% UPSIDE to BUY Parkson Retail (O9E)

Sharing some information and personal views on Parkson Retail (O9E)

Based on the charts, unlikely there will be any immediate recovery. the downtrend has been quite rampant since the break of 0.150 and 0.140 mark. There are 2 ways to look at it:








1. for trading clients who are trying their luck at 0.150 or lower, there has to have a stop loss price level. This is to avoid huge paper loss if it were to fall even lower. But do note that no one knows where is the bottom price. if only life is that simple, we all will be able to buy at the lowest and sell at the highest. On hindsight, it seems not right to buy at 0.150 because it is now 0.120 (lowest as of now 0.118). but based on 1 year price history, 0.150 is a mark for rebound.  

For that, a way out would be to average down the current holding price. However, please note that averaging only works if the price goes up. If not, it will be simply just increasing trading losses when the price goes further south .

If averaging, one can consider picking some shares at strategic prices, such as 0.120, or 0.130 etc.


2. for clients who are still holding on (including myself for my personal trades), you can look at the fundamental and valuation of the company. In summary, there are 2 driving forces resulting in the massive drop in this counter. 

        a. Firstly Parkson Retail reports earnings in MYR (Malaysian Ringgit). With the current strong USD, MYR has been weakened significantly.  
        b. Retail business has been on the decline. 

                "...Same-store sales for Parkson Retail Group fell 9.7 percent in the first half, while for the Golden Eagle Retail Group the drop was 8.7 percent. Chinese shopping centre operator Intime Retail, which is backed by Alibaba, posted sales that fell 3.7 percent in the first nine months of the year." Taken fromhttp://www.scmp.com/business/markets/article/2044786/chinas-traditional-retail-industry-remain-weak-shoppers-stay-home

As such under such marco environment, it is both difficult and probably impossible for the price to recover to its former glory in short period of time, much less the 0.150 mark. 

But all is not lost.

This share is listed on 3th Nov 2011, with an offer price of 0.940. Of course, times have changed and this might not be an accurate measurement of the current valuation of shares.



Parkson Retail and Group are currently listed in KLSE, SGX and HKSE. The recent analyst report (30th Nov) of Parkson Retail 5657.KL from MorningStar gives a fair value of 0.84 sens. With 0.84sens as an indicative fair value, converting sens to cents that is currency conversion MYR to SGD respectively, it comes to about 0.28cents fair value. (0.84/3 = 0.28)

Personally, I will take it at 0.200cents conservatively due to SGX trading mechanism. The price at 0.200 increases differently after the 0.200 mark. That is to say 0.199, 0.200, 0.205, 0.210. For traders who have bought at 0.199 will naturally sell at 0.205 for a gain of 6 pips, which translates to a stagnant of price around the 0.200 before the next decisive move.




In terms of managing and operating, the group has been actively managing its outlets, closing down the unprofitable outlets with stringent cost control measures. By closing down the unprofitable outlets, it helps to reduce costs and losses, which is only logical to do so.  

Lastly, from the AGM report, the management is currently deploying experimental shopping experience and organising events in hopes to draw more retail crowds to the malls. Not to mention, the group has free online shopping to buy products from their website with no delivery costs.

I took a few screenshots and attached the document for reference. For my friends who have the shares already, if you have spare cash, consider averaging down at a preferred price. 

And for the rest who are still not keen in Parkson and are looking to buy into retail business sector, certainly, there are other considerations such as BHG holdings, captialmall trust etc. Each has its merits and shortcomings.

Sharing my personal views, compiling it for all. Feel free to share and discuss if I missed out anything.

//amazon