31 July 2017

SELL SIA (S$10.00 target price)


  • We maintain our HOLD recommendation on SIA  (SIA SP) with a S$10.00 target price. Odds of an earnings recovery is low, given continued yield pressures.
  •  While SIA's May pax loads improved 3.9ppt yoy, we believe this could be largely at the expense of yields.
  • We expect yields to remain challenged in FY18 as excess capacity and security concerns over terror attacks lead to capacity diversions and impact Asian network carriers. For instance, US airlines are said to be reducing capacity from Trans-Atlantic routes and shifting to Trans-Pacific routes. This will exacerbate capacity pressure and consequently yields for most Asian carriers, including SIA.
  • Separately, flight restrictions on Qatar Airways (QR) might not benefit SIA. QR has a 9% share of the Kangaroo route between Australia and Europe. However, competition for QR's share is keen and might not be in SIA's favour as the three primary Middle-Eastern carriers have lowered prices, with fares substantially lower than SIA’s.

  • We also believe that a disposal of SIA Engineering (SIAEC) is not in SIA’s shareholders’ interest and is unlikely part of SIA's transformation plan. This is due to a) SIAEC's ROE is substantially higher than the parent airline and provides a much needed buffer to airline operations, b) about 60% of SIAEC's revenue is derived from SIA and the unit is vertically integrated with SIA's operations providing revenue and cost synergies.SIAEC also generally benefits when SIA places new orders and this can be evidenced by an engine JV with GE, following SIA’s purchase of GE9X Engines for the Boeing B777-9s.


SIA will likely provide greater details on its transformation plans by end-November. Until then, we expect the stock to languish sideways.

For now, we maintain our HOLD recommendation and target price of S$10.00. We will be sellers at 5% above our target price, and buyers near S$9.00.

24 July 2017

S$10 trading fee AVAILABLE~!



Additional points to note:

  1. per trade will be S$10 min or 0.12%, which ever is higher
  2. Contra trading is ALLOWED on UOBKH
  3. No min trades required.
  4. Cash upfront before trading
  5. Only for SG stocks




Interested parties please drop me a message. 


My team will send the forms to you.


Thank you

20 July 2017

AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC)

AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) Stock Price Trading Overview:
AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) dropped with negative flow of -2.59% during recent week and go up so far this year; showing a rise of 16.22%. The shares price has positioned 2.13% up over the past quarter while it has directed 10.95% toward a rising position throughout past six months. The shares price has directed 8.50% toward a higher level throughout last year and swapped -4.49% toward a weak spot during past one month.
AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) is sinking -0.71% to $21.07. Analysts have a mean recommendation of 3.00 on this stock. The company holds 351.76 million outstanding shares and 351.76 million shares are floating in market. Institutional owners hold 56.30% stake in the company, while insiders ownership held at 0.70%. The stock has a beta value of 0.22. It sustained ROA (TTM) at 2.50%. The stock’s short float is around of 2.64% and short ratio is 2.18.
Technical Indicators of AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC):
Currently, the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is at 42.84. RSI is a quick tool you can use to gauge overbought and oversold levels, the Relative Strength Index. The premise is simple, however. When RSI moves above 70, it is overbought and could lead to a downward move. When RSI moves below 30, it is oversold and could lead to an upward move. But, we must be patient before we enter our trades, because sometimes the RSI can stay overbought or oversold for quite awhile. The worst thing we can do is try to pick a top or a bottom of a strong move that continues to move into further overbought or oversold territory. So we must wait until the RSI crosses back under 70 or crosses back above 30.
AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) stock’s current distance from 20-Day Simple Moving Average is -2.68% and moving -0.07% away from 50-Day Simple Moving Average while traded up 6.57% from 200-Day Simple Moving Average. The stock has advanced 21.83% to a low over the previous one year and showed declining move -5.68% to a high over the same period. Tracking the stock price in relation to moving averages as well as highs and lows for the year might assist with evaluating future stock performance. They may also be used to assist the trader figure out proper support and resistance levels for the stock.
AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) changed 4.8 million shares at hands on July 19, 2017 versus to the average volume of 4.26 million shares. Its relative volume is 1.13. When analyzing volume, determine the strength or weakness of a move. As traders, we are more interested to take part in strong moves and don’t join moves that show weakness – or we may even watch for an entry in the opposite direction of a weak move. These guidelines do not hold true in all situations, but they are a good general aid in trading decisions. When a stock traded on high volume then is it is good time for active Investors to attain the opportunity of this situation. For every buyer, there needs to be someone who sold them the shares they bought, just as there must be a buyer in order for a seller to get rid of his or her shares. This battle between buyers and sellers for the best price in all different time frames creates movement while longer-term technical and fundamental factors play out. Using volume to analyze stocks can bolster profits and also reduce risk.
AGNC stock Ratings:
Analysts reported their respective ratings recommendation for AGNC. According to WSJ one month ago research; the Company remained on “Buy” beliefs from 2. 8 told the investors of the company to “Hold” stock. 0 revealed the “Sell” stock. “Overweight” signal reported by 0 and “Underweight” rating was suggested by 1. This research report and rating ought to be used to complement individual research and plans. Do investors think to respond accordingly to new analyst’s rating and change a position based on the analyst’s rating opinion without any further research? Of course not. Rating varies from one analyst to other analyst. One may say buy while other recommend sell.
AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) reported that its Board of Directors has reported a cash dividend of $0.18 per share of ordinary stock for July 2017. The dividend is payable on August 7, 2017 to ordinary stockholders of record as of July 31, 2017, with an ex-dividend date of July 27, 2017.

AGNC’s June 30, 2017 net book value per ordinary share will be reported co presently with the Company’s q2 earnings release, which is planned for July 26, 2017.

14 July 2017

GLP picks Chinese consortium for final buyout talks



Global Logistic Properties, the Singapore warehouse operator pursuing a sale, has picked a Chinese bidder consortium for final talks on a deal valuing the company at about US$10 billion (S$13.8 billion), people with knowledge of the matter said.
The investor group, fronted by GLP chief executive officer Ming Mei, edged out a rival consortium led by Warburg Pincus, according to the people.
The Chinese consortium, which includes private equity firms Hillhouse Capital Management and Hopu Investment Management, is planning to offer around $3 a share for GLP and will now negotiate definitive terms for the deal, the people said, asking not to be identified because the information is private.
Under the deal being contemplated, GLP would be taken private through a scheme of arrangement, the people said.
The Chinese investor group will seek to obtain an undertaking from Singapore sovereign fund GIC, which owns about 37 per cent of the company, to vote in favour of the offer, the people said.
The 3.875 per cent notes of GLP due in 2025 climbed 1.2 cents on the dollar to 97.1 cents as of 12.30pm local time yesterday, according to Bloomberg-compiled prices, the biggest jump in four weeks.
GLP is nearing the end of a months-long sale process that has faced bidder complaints that the management group has an advantage with privileged access to information.
If an agreement is reached, the purchase of GLP would become the largest private equity buyout of an Asian company by enterprise value, surpassing last year's takeover of Qihoo 360 Technology, data compiled by Bloomberg show.
"The market views the possible winner more favourably than the rivals, in the sense that there is continuity, familiarity and less disruption to the business," Mr Ezien Hoo, a credit analyst at Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp said. "Whether the new owner will load GLP with more debt remains to be seen."
Shares of GLP have surged 43 per cent over the past year, giving it a market value of about $12.7 billion. It was the best performer during the period on Singapore's benchmark Straits Times Index, which gained 11 per cent.
The company was halted from trading its stock yesterday, pending an announcement.
China Vanke, one of the country's largest residential developers, is a member of the management- backed consortium, according to the people.
Ping An Insurance Group of China, which previously held talks about partnering with the Chinese investors, did not end up joining the deal, the people said.
E-commerce companies such as Alibaba Group Holding and JD.com are driving a boom in demand for warehouse space in Asia.
"Warehouses in Asia is a fast- growing sector that attracts a lot of interest," Mr Greg Hyland, head of capital markets at Jones Lang LaSalle, said.
"There's a substantial undersupply of modern logistics in China, so we are seeing a lot of growth there."
BLOOMBERG

12 July 2017

Qns: How can I learn stock trading as a teenager?




The FASTEST way to learn is when your money is in it. Before you make your move, read more, ask more and make friends.

Make friends?!

Yes, you will need a network of information to be ahead of news publications (if possible). That will give you an incredible edge over others.

Do not confuse insights with insides.
  1. Insights are information and conclusions which you derived from observations and others.
  2. Insides are simply material information from corporate meetings that are not released to the public yet.

Lastly, be prepared to lose money in stock trading. Losing money is ok to a point, but do not lose the lessons behind it.

10 July 2017

BUY: Parkson Credit still optimistic about motorcycle financing

http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/parkson-credit-still-optimistic-about-motorcycle-financing
KUALA LUMPUR: The investing fraternity is getting disappointed with Parkson Holdings Bhd’s retail business, particularly its operations in China which was once perceived as a cash cow.
However, few may have noticed that the retail group has commenced its credit services business. And that the new operation is already churning good growth, although the contribution to Parkson Holdings’ bottom line is not significant as yet.
According to senior general manager Danny Poh Wan Chung, who is at the helm of Parkson Credit, with an initial paid-up capital of RM30 million from Parkson Holdings, Parkson Credit has breached the RM1 million mark for profit after tax (PAT) for the financial year ended June 30, 2016 (FY16).
“Personally, I have a very ambitious target for this company, in terms of profit. I'm quite satisfied [with the performance so far]. It is within my mark, and we are aiming to benchmark it with the industry in terms of profit margins against the industry best,” Poh told The Edge Financial Daily.
For FY16, the company achieved PAT of RM1.02 million compared with a net loss after tax of RM31,296 in FY15. Meanwhile, its revenue swelled close to 12 times to RM13.06 million compared with RM1.11 million a year ago.
“For FY17, we are expecting to achieve a high multiplied growth in both revenue and net profit,” said Poh, noting that the main driver for PAT growth is the economics of scale that Parkson Credit will enjoy as its business expands.
“Being fairly new [and for the immediate future], Parkson Credit is not contributing much in revenue to Parkson Holdings, however, we expect to be a significant profit-contributing company [to the group later]” Poh added.
In 2013, Parkson Holdings chairman Tan Sri William Cheng, who is also the managing director, came out with the idea of restarting Lion Group’s financial service business in the retail group.
Poh then set up this wholly-owned unit, Parkson Credit. Within one year, Poh had it up and running.
Motorcycle financing is the main area that Parkson Credit is focussing on currently. It generates about 95% of the company’s sales.
In view of the wide profit margin of over 20%, Poh reckons that Parkson Credit’s contribution will be more towards the group’s bottom line instead of revenue.
Commenting on non-performing loans (NPL), Poh said Parkson Credit’s bad debt recovery has improved last year compared with the initial year. However, he acknowledged that there is room for improvement as the company is still behind the industry’s best. With a NPL ratio of below 4%, Poh is expecting it to go down lower and to be comparable with the industry’s best of about 2.8%.
New motorcycle purchases dropped 14% after the introduction of the goods and services tax in 2015. Poh is expecting a single-digit drop this year as it did in 2016.
Poh said Parkson Credit was also formed to create synergy in order to support Parkson Holding’s current and future portfolio of consumer-focused business.
“Taking a look at other global retail industry players, notable organisations such as AEON and Wal-Mart are often associated with a credit financial services arm to supplement its retail business,” Poh said.
Given the rising cost of living and a weaker ringgit, which drives the demand for credit purchase, Poh said non-bank lenders are expected to continue to thrive in the near future bridging the gap of medium- and low-income eligible credit financing requirements.
“It is our intention to start out in the most competitive environment. By entering into an already competitive market, we are able to gauge capability to compete and thus gain competitive confidence in the market,” said Poh.
“With that, we are able to put our foothold in the market and establish ourselves as a key player in the industry in the near future. From there we can launch more financial services products in the near future,” Poh said.
Without relying heavily on marketing and promotions to drive sales, Poh said Parkson Credit is dependent on the recommendation from its motorcycle dealer network.
With the recent achievement of 100,000 applicants serving close to 540 dealer outlets, Parkson Credit is targeting to reach 1,000 dealer outlets by the end of 2019 and will be focusing on dealers within the capital states.
The company had obtained the moneylending licence early this year. “Hence, it is a matter of timing before we decide to roll it out into the market,” Poh said.
Poh added the company plans  to introduce a variety of financing products and services in the near future, which includes hire purchase, personal financing, insurance services, small and medium-sized enterprise financing and others.

Financial Times: Noble seeks debt waiver from lenders


Personally NOBLE is gone.....







Noble seeks debt waiver from lenders
Commodity trader faces risk of breaching covenant on $1.1bn credit line
YESTERDAY by: Neil Hume, Commodities and Mining Editor

Noble Group, the Hong-Kong based commodity trader, has asked lenders to waive a debt covenant tied to a $1.1bn credit line that matures next year while it continues work on a plan to recapitalise the business.

Noble wants the banks to set aside the condition on the borrowing facility given the risk that a measure of net debt to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation could rise above an agreed limit this year, according to people with knowledge of the discussions.

The approach to lenders comes just weeks after the crisis-hit trader was granted a four-month extension to repay or refinance another credit line.

Noble declined to comment on discussions with its lenders. Credit investors said they expected Noble’s lenders to grant the waiver.

Founded in the 1980s by former metals dealer Richard Elman, Noble rose to become one of Asia’s biggest commodity traders, helping to meet China’s seemingly insatiable appetite for raw materials.

But in recent years the company, which acts as a middleman for coal, iron ore and oil deals, has been hit hard by a downturn in commodity markets amid questions about its accounting.

Noble’s market value has collapsed to $600m from more than $11bn at its peak in 2011 as investors and analysts have doubted management’s ability to turn around the business.

In May, Noble announced a first-quarter loss of $130m, which it blamed on a “challenging” operating environment and unusual movements in the coal market. It also reported a 14 per cent increase in net debt to $3.29bn.

Over the past year, Noble has sold businesses, raised money from shareholders and replaced its chief executive. It has also been searching for a strategic investor to help recapitalise the business and manage its debt load. The company must repay or refinance $2bn of debt and loans over the next year.

But so far it has failed to find an investor and some analysts believe it will have to sell parts of its oil unit, one of its core operations. Paul Brough, who took over as chairman in May from Mr Elman, is leading a strategic review of the entire business.

Shares in Noble leapt 36 per cent to S$0.64 cents on Thursday on speculation that Noble had launched a formal sale process for its US oil division.

Noble, however, said it was not aware of any reason for the price rise in response to an inquiry from the Singapore stock exchange, where its shares are listed. The Financial Times reported in June that Noble had received unsolicited approaches for its oil business from industry rivals.

Even after Thursday’s rise, Noble shares are still down more than 90 per cent since early 2015 when Iceberg Research, a previously unknown research group, produced the first in series of reports highly critical of the company. Noble has always defended its accounting.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2017. All rights reserved.

06 July 2017

How does Smart Money take money from retail traders?

I can write this the whole night. But I will give u the summarised version in italics:
The Smart money will force you to take the shares that they want you to, and sell back to them when they want you to.
The best part of this is, you will be willing to do so without any forceful or deceit means.
The current generation of people, young and old believe in doing their own research and reading reviews. All these smart money gotta do is to feed retailers with different forms of sophistry via research articles and whatnots. That said, have you realised why most brokerage houses give FREE market updates on buy and sell calls? (bear with me, coming to this point soon)
Though I am not saying paid subscriptions are better or accurate, this is only one side of the industry that most retail traders do not realise. Retail traders are blinded by the fact houses are giving FREE market updates/report, taking for granted that brokerage houses have to do so because they, the clients, are paying trading fees to the houses.
Sadly, they, the paying clients, did not realise that at the same time, they are bargaining for cheaper brokerage fees too. It’s almost like asking someone to work longer hours for lower wages. As the saying goes, you pay peanuts you get monkeys. Market reports or stock research are given for FREE for a reason. Not because brokerage houses or smart money are evil to write such reports, but retails traders are always wanting the most but not wanting to pay for it.
Everything has 2 sides to it. These research reports are still correct and accurate, but merely the flip side of certain facts of a company. The key point is that the research reports will have a certain agenda to be fulfilled in favour of the smart money.
After all, there will be a certain cost for doing up retail traders’ shares settlements. These costs have to come from somewhere. IF brokerage houses were to increase trading fees, they will lose business because retail traders are unhappy.
Research reports may come from the houses or the smart money themselves. So brokerage houses will team up with smart money to push and pull stocks to the retail clients.
And FINALLY the successful model will be like this:
  1. Smart money can load or unload according to their needs based on their private research.
  2. Brokerage houses continue to have ongoing businesses even the fees are lower than low as times go by.
  3. Retail traders still have their low fees for individual trading. And they are ok if they lose money in the market. But certainly not ok with high trading fees.
The final results?
Smart money continues to be smart, churning out obscene profits for investors.
Brokerage houses are happy because their business can survive and be making a profit supporting the smart money and, keeping low fees for retail traders too.
Retail traders have their low fees and are happy too. When they got trading losses, the retail traders blame themselves for wrong perspectives or the current market conditions.
VOILA everyone is happy.


This is only 1 side of the story for investing. If I have time I will explain the other side of the story on trading. It is something I have been sharing with my clients

If you are not in touch with your broker, you may consider doing so.


My 2 cents! 

04 July 2017

FYI: NetLink NBN Trust's IPO: A Brief Walk Through History

The private placement for NetLink trust is ongoing. Details are at the bottom of this email









Taken from: https://www.fool.sg/2017/06/30/netlink-nbn-trusts-ipo-a-brief-walk-through-history/

NetLink NBN Trust’s IPO: A Brief Walk Through History


Chin Hui Leong | June 30, 2017 | More on: B2F CC3 T39 Z74

Singapore Telecommunication Limited’s (SGX: Z74) associate, NetLink Trust, has filed its preliminary prospectus to list on the Singapore stock exchange as NetLink NBN Trust.

NetLink Trust is a business trust that was established under IMDA’s (Info-communications Media Development Authority of Singapore) effective open access requirements for Singapore’s NextGen NBN initiative. Singtel’s stake in NetLink Trust can be considered to be unconventional. The unusual arrangement and the trust’s IPO can be traced back its history.

With that in mind, let’s take a quick look at the trust’s history.

A long, long time ago …

The history of NetLink NBN Trust can be traced back to a consortium called OpenNet.
OpenNet was owned by Singtel, Axia NetMedia Corporation, Singapore Press Holdings (SGX: T39), and SP Telecommunications. Singtel and Axia had a 30% stake each while SPH had a 25% stake. The remaining 15% was with SP Telecommunications.  
In late 2008, OpenNet was designated as the “Network Company” after winning a competitive tender to design, build and maintain passive infrastructure in Singapore. In conjunction with the tender, Singtel committed to transfer infrastructure such as manholes, ducts and exchange buildings to OpenNet. Allen Lew, who was Singtel’s CEO Singapore back then, said:
“… passive network assets like ducts and manholes will no longer be a telco’s competitive advantage as every service provider has equal access to the infrastructure.”

With that, OpenNet would be tasked in building a ultra-high-speed broadband network that would connect all physical addresses in Singapore and its connecting islands.

This valuable access will be sold to service providers and telcos.
Along came Netlink Trust (and controversy!)

In 2011, NetLink Trust was established. Singtel had full ownership of NetLink Trust and transferred its underground ducts, manholes and central offices into the trust. These infrastructure assets were used to support OpenNet’s fiber network deployment.
But it was a strategic move in 2013 that had Singtel’s rivals up in arms.

In 2013, NetLink Trust proposed to acquire OpenNet (through its trustee CityNet). Seven opposing companies, including Singtel’s rivals M1 Ltd (SGX: B2F) and StarHub Ltd (SGX: CC3), released a strongly worded statement against the acquisition. The group said:
“We must respectfully dismiss any suggestion that CityNet will be a ‘neutral’ or ‘independent’ entity that will serve the best interests of the industry. On the contrary, under the Act, CityNet is obliged to put SingTel’s interests ahead of its own.”

In its defense, CityNet said:
“There are safeguards in place to prevent SingTel from having control over NetLink Trust. CityNet’s independence is also preserved by a majority-independent board and a professional management team.”

Singtel also added its voice, saying:
“NetLink Trust and CityNet operate within a strict regulatory framework that ensures open access to the Next Gen NBN fibre network and regulated pricing to all industry operators.”

Ultimately, the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA) approved the deal, but it came with caveats to address concerns raised by Singtel’s competitors.

For one, Singtel will relinquish its role as OpenNet’s key subcontractor and transfer all relevant personnel into OpenNet. NetLink Trust will also receive all assets under OpenNet. Most crucially, Singtel is also mandated to divest more than 75% of its holdings by April 2018.
And that brings us to the present day with the NetLink Trust IPO.

As you can see, the roots of NetLink Trust’s IPO can be traced back to OpenNet and the controversy behind NetLink Trust’s acquisition of OpenNet. In the trust’s preliminary IPO filing, Singtel indicated that it will be maintaining a 24.99% stake in NetLink NBN Trust after the IPO.   


For more investing insights and to keep up to date on the latest financial and stock market news, you can sign up for a FREE subscription to The Motley Fool's investing newsletter, Take Stock Singapore







We are currently having book building exercise for NetLink NBN Trust ("NLT") IPO. The Company preliminary prospectus web-link are attached at the bottom of this email for your information please.

For those interested to participate in this exercise, please email the required information stated below to me
1.  TR code:
2.  Client code:
3.  Client name:
4.  Indicative demand  [ units ] :
5.   Offering price:              S$0.80 to S$0.93 per unit

Please note:

1)    Book building exercise is scheduled to close on the 7 July 2017 (Friday), at 12 pm.

2)    To avoid duplicate order, please email your order once only.

3)    IOI must be reflective of the clients' true demand. No withdrawals or amendments to the IOIs will be permitted after the book is closed.

4)    1% brokerage plus GST is chargeable for allocable demand.

5)    Allocation result will be communicated via email after the prospectus is registered with MAS.




ISSUER : NetLink NBN Trust (“NLT”)

TRUSTEE-MANAGER: NetLink NBN Management Pte. Ltd.

SINGTEL STAKE POST IPO:  24.99% before exercise of over-allotment option

LISTING : Mainboard of SGX-ST

LISTING CURRENCY: SGD

KEY INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS:
More detailed information on NLT business description can be found in the preliminary prospectus lodged with MAS dated 27 June 2017

·         Critical infrastructure enabling Singapore’s Next Gen NBN
·         Resilient business model with transparent, predictable and regulated revenue stream
·         Sole nationwide provider of residential fibre network in Singapore, an attractive market with high demand for fibre broadband services
·         Well positioned to benefit from growth in the non-residential segment as the independent nationwide network provider
·         Well positioned to capitalise on growth in connected services including Singapore’s Smart Nation initiatives
·         Extensive nationwide network affording natural barrier to entry
·         Highly scalable operations and credit strength support unitholder returns
·         Experienced management team with proven track record

SYNDICATE:
·         Joint Global Coordinators and Issue Managers: DBS, Morgan Stanley and UBS
·         Joint Bookrunners and Underwriters: DBS, Morgan Stanley, UBS, BAML, Citi, HSBC, OCBC and UOB

OFFERING PRICE RANGE: S$0.80 – S$0.93 per Unit

BASE OFFERING SIZE OF 2,898,000,001 units (appx $2,318.4m to $2,695.1m):
·         Public offer of up to [S$250m]
·         Over-allotment option (OA) of up to approx. S$100m: approx. 107.5m units to 125m units

TOTAL UNITS OUTSTANDING, POST OFFERING (ASSUME FULL OA OPTION EXERCISED): 3,971.5m units to 3,989m units

FORECAST DISTRIBUTION YIELD
·         FP2018E: 4.73% to 5.50% (annualized);
·         FY2019E: 4.99% to 5.80%
All distributions are exempt from Singapore tax for all investors

MARKET CAPITALISATION (BASED ON OFFERING PRICE RANGE): S$3,091.2m – S$3,593.5m

LOCK-UP: 6 months (from Listing Date) lock-up for the Trustee-Manager, Singtel and HoldCo

USE OF PROCEEDS:
·         Settlement of the cash component of the aggregate consideration payable to Singtel for the acquisition of 100% units of NetLink Trust (NLT) by the Trust;
·         Repayment of the principal amount of S$1,100,000,000 due and owing under the facility agreement with Singtel;
·         Funding the consideration for the purchase by the Trust Group of approximately 27,000 lead-in ducts from Singtel;
·         Funding the consideration for (a) the purchase by the Trust of the shares of NLT Trustee and (b) the purchase by Unitholders of beneficial interests in the Trustee-Manager;
·         Payment of the equity issue expenses and other costs
·         If the over-allotment option is exercised in full, the additional proceeds may be used for capital expenditure and general corporate purposes

INDICATIVE TIMETABLE:
·         Books open: 27 June, 2017 upon MAS lodgment
·         Books close: 12pm, 07 July, 2017 or subject to notification by the Bookrunners
·         Pricing & allocation: 10 July, 2017
·         MAS registration: 10 July, 2017
·         Singapore Public Offer: 10 – 17 July, 2017
·         Listing: 19 July, 2017 at [3PM]

SELLING RESTRICTIONS: Regulation S, Cat 1.

END PLACEE BROKERAGE: 1.0% & applicable GST payable by all investors in the Placement Tranche

MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS: Multiple applications are allowed between the Placement and Public Offer Tranches

Preliminary Prospectus

https://eservices.mas.gov.sg/opera/Public/SD/ViewOfferDoc.aspx?shrID=28909a732b1d42649c306764a5b3325b







01 July 2017

Why ETF is not always the best choice?

With a stock, maybe. You could pick the right one and put all your $10k in it. You might get lucky to have it double or triple like Apple has done since it initiated its dividend and capital return program about 5 years ago. 
With an ETF, definitely not. But you also are way more likely to have preserved your principal. I think a dividend-focused broad based index fund like DVY will get you about 3–4% per year in dividends, plus will match the market return on price appreciation which is about 8% per year. So let’s say, in total, about 10–12% per year without too much undue risk. 
To get rich, you have to take risks. Sometimes they work out. Sometimes they don’t. But excess risk and excess return are pretty highly correlated. Not saying that all risk always get all returns. So to have the best gains for your investment, it is necessary to take some calculated risks. 
//amazon