14 December 2017

Fundamental BUY call: HongKongLand (H78) Target price $8.30

Hi All, this is our first (official) fundamental stock pick as we seek to create a place with both fundamental and technical ideas for sharing with investors and traders reading our blog. Welcome any feedback and ideas from our readers. 

We will also be including it in our model dummy fundamental portfolio to track the performance of our investment track record (mostly for our own learning purposes). For fun reading and sharing. Happy holidays! :)


Hong Kong Land

About
One of the largest property developer and investment group in Asia, owning and managing almost 800,000 sqm of prime office and retail property in key Asian cities. Hong Kong and Singapore made up bulk of the portfolio with 452,000 sqm (56%) and 165,000 sqm (20%) respectively.


FY16 Operating income by segment:
Commercial property: 77.8% (should be mostly investment property rental income)
Residential property: 22.2% (should be mostly property dev profits)



Source: HKL

My View: 
  • While this is just an over simplistic way of looking at the stock, I see HKL as a good proxy to the property market in HK, with its Grade A office assets in Central HK, that may benefit from the booming Chinese economy. Valuations are also backed by its grade A prime office and retail properties such as (Exchange Square, Forum, Jardine House etc in HK, and 33% owned One raffles Quay and MBFC in Singapore).
  • With P/B near a multi year low (0.5x), and potential for rise in dividend in the near term (given the dividend history and potential increase in rental income from contributions from new assets, and also multi year low net gearing), think HKL may be a good addition to my medium to long term portfolio at $7.22.
  • While waiting, I get a dividend yield of 2.6 % (based on current DPS of $0.19- same as CPF – might as well)

Investment merits:
Trading At 0.5x P/B (with most of its assets at prime locations in cities such as Hong Kong and Singapore), which is near a multi year low and -1SD of its 10 year range. Also attractive when vs its peers like CK asset, Swire properties and Champion REIT who are trading at 0.6-0.9x P/B.

P/B is near a multi-year low and -1SD of its 10 year range.











Source: Bloomberg

Leasing momentum slowed, but overall rental growth still positive in HK. The vacancy rate for prime office space in HK Central rose to 2.4% in 3Q from 1.7% in 2Q, according to Colliers International. According to Colliers, Rents in Central/ Admiralty increased 0.4% QOQ, supported by sustainable renewal and new demand irrespective of the rising relocation trend. Hong Kong’s office area forms 48% of HKL’s total investment portfolio (by floor area).
  • ·   For 1H18, HKL’s HK central office portfolio as at 30th Jun 17 maintained its high occupancy rate with only 1.5% vacancy rates. Average office rent rose to HK$106 psf vs HK$103 in 1H and 2H 16. Its HK central retail portfolio was 99.4% occupied with little change in base rents. There were some mildly negative rental reversions in its Sg office portfolio (S$9.1 psf vs $9.4 psf and $9.2 psf in 1H and 2H16 respectively), but occupancy rate remained strong with vacancy of only 0.2% as at end of Jun 17.


New contribution from Beijing retail mall coming on stream in 4Q?  (84% owned) WF Central (Beijing ) comprising luxury retail complex and 74 room Mandarin Oriental hotel is scheduled for completion in late 2017 and 2018 respectively.



Good free cashflow yield… As a result of its steady rental income from investment properties, HKL typically generates very good free cash flow of more than US$500m in the last 3 years (FY16: US$948m, translating to a free cashflow yield of 5.5%). This has helped it continuously pare down its net gearing to only 5.5%, which will allow HKL to scoop up good assets if investment opportunities arises. 
US$m
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
Last 12M
12 Months Ending
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
06/30/2017
Cash From Operations
299
908
699
896
1,096
1,202
Capital Expenditures
(515)
(134)
(137)
(152)
(148)
(139)
Free Cash Flow
(216)
774
562
744
948
1,063

Net Debt To Shareholders Equity
12.5%
11.2%
9.6%
8.1%
6.4%
5.5%
Source: Bloomberg

and potential for rising dividends? Noted that dividend/share has been stagnant for 2014-2016 at US$0.19 (dividend yield: 2.6%). If you study the pattern of its dividend payment, DPS remained at US$0.16 from 2009-2011 (3 years) before slowly increasing DPS by US$0.01/year from 2012-2014. If 3 years is a cycle, can we potentially see management raising dividend again this year by at least US$0.01 (or best 1 shot US$0.03). This is considering the potential rise in core investment property rental income (from the potential positive rental reversion in its HK office rentals, new revenue contribution from the new mall in Beijing, WF Central (84% owned) which will be coming up soon in 4Q, and continuously decreasing net D/E which is now at 5.5% (lowest in years)

US$
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
Dividends per Share
0.13
0.16
0.16
0.16
0.17
0.18
0.19
0.19
0.19
Diluted EPS
(0.05)
0.78
2.02
2.27
0.61
0.51
0.56
0.86
1.42
Dividend Payout Ratio
19.8%
7.6%
7.0%
27.8%
35.6%
33.7%
22.2%
13.4%
Source: Bloomberg

Technically, prices have been consolidating between $7.10-7.80, after a strong rally from $5.95 at the start of the year. With prices near the low end of the trading range, and potential near-term catalysts such as the completion of the 84% owned WF Central in Beijing and hopefully higher dividends (my guess- prays), hopefully the stock will be ready to retest $7.80 and breakout soon.













05 December 2017

SGstocksandshares (SGSAS) 2018

SGStockandshares has started more than 5 years ago. I meet very interesting people along the way, sharing trading ideas as a stockbroker and exchanging market views. Some are my clients and many my friends now, helping each other to network and achieve greater heights together. I have to say it is an enjoyable experience and fruitful journey. Thank you!

Coming 2018, there will be some changes and revamps to the sections of this site. Very likely there will be a change of content too. Fundamentally the aim of the blog remains the same; sharing and learning together. It should continue to serve all my followers in a simple yet concise manner. And naturally, I welcome all passionate friends to join me as clients on this investing journey.

So stay tuned, and let's continue our stock pick journey in 2018! 

Feel free to drop me a message via at the bottom right-hand corner of the window!


28 November 2017

BUY PARKSON RETAIL (O9E) FOR 40% UPSIDE

update:

JOHOR BARU: The largest mall in Malaysia's Johor state opened its doors on Tuesday (Nov 28). 
Located along the Skudai Highway, Paradigm Mall JB spans more than 2 million sq ft and is just a 20-minute ride from the Woodlands Causeway.  

(Source: Paradigm Mall JB) 

The mall is bigger than Singapore's largest shopping centre VivoCity, which has a gross floor area of 1.5 million sq ft. 
Paradigm Mall JB will feature the largest movie theatre in the state operated by Golden Screen Cinemas, premium supermarket Village Grocer as well as department store operator Parkson.
Parkson will be the mall's anchor tenant, taking up 200,000 sq ft of space. The outlet is Parkson's first regional store in the southern part of Peninsular Malaysia. 
For adrenaline junkies, the mall showcases a 20,000 sq ft ice skating rink, a Camp5 indoor climbing gym and Malaysia's first indoor skate park.

With more than 500 retail lots spread over six floors, some well-known names among the tenants include H&M, Uniqlo, Harvey Norman, Wendy's, Marrybrown and Under Armour. 
Apart from the retail and mall space, the complex also features a 24-storey serviced apartments tower and a 296-room four-star hotel. 
Paradigm Mall, which has another shopping complex in Petaling Jaya near Kuala Lumpur, is owned and developed by WCT Holdings. 

Read more at http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/lifestyle/johor-s-largest-shopping-centre-paradigm-malljb-opens-9446578






The last report on Nov indicated that Parkson retail has S$12m losses, majorly due to an increment of operational cost and gestation of new stores.

As a result, the shares have tanked from 0.125 to a low of 0.063.


Recent buying volume below 0.075



Note the stated reason is for the lack of revenue. It states that it is due to the absence of festival holidays of Hari Raya/LeBaran.

However, this also means that it will be starting in June 2018.


Eid al-Fitr 2018 will begin on the evening of

Thursday
14 June
and ends on the evening of

Friday
15 June

This means that there will be likely no negative results that will be released from now until June.

Next, Tan Sri Cheng Heng Jem holds, directly and indirectly, 53.52% of the voting shares in PHB, which is the sole shareholder of East Crest International Limited. East Crest International, in turn, owns almost 70% of Parkson. There is no insider selling, and I assume the Parent would want money to flow back upwards, hence I believe the "will" to distribute dividends will be there.


They are paying themselves peanuts. I like in terms of presence in popular malls, parkson has done a good job too. Look at the three links

1) http://www.kuala-lumpur.ws/klshopping/top-10-shopping.htm

2) http://www.wonderfulmalaysia.com/faq/top10-shopping-malls-in-kuala-lumpur.htm

3) http://web.parkson.com.my/whatson/store-locator/

In either survey, Parkson is the anchor tenant in 4- 5 of the most popular malls.

Also, if u take a look at Aeon, a competitor in the department store space. U compare Apple to Apple, by taking only Aeon Retailing Segment and Parkson Malaysia Segment, Parkson again fare better.

Now looking at the charts, there are some buying volume from any prices below 0.070.

I strongly believe that it will retest the 0.100 price level first, and then 0.125 if there is strong volume.






This is backed by the latest EPS (Earnings Per Share) as well as NAV (Net Asset Value) of the shares.

In other words, given the current price 0.074, we are looking at an upside of 35% if it hits 0.100. Worth a try to do some bottom fishing here!

Good luck!



Summary:

Entry:  below 0.075
First Take Profits: 0.090 to 0.100
Second Take Profit: 0.115 to 0.121

Cut Loss: 0.065

21 November 2017

SELL CALL: Singapore Dividends to Drop: study




Taken from : http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/singapore-dividends-to-drop-study


SINGAPORE dividends are in for another tough year to the dismay of the legions of retiree investors; they also take some shine off the bull run in which the Straits Times Index has risen some 12 per cent since January.
Aggregate dividends (ordinary plus special) in 2017 will fall 3.6 per cent year on year (yoy) to S$16 billion from S$16.6 billion reported a year ago, said financial data provider IHS Markit.





This will be the second straight year that single-digit negative growth is reported.

Disappointing income huggers are dividend stalwarts such as StarHub, SPH and Keppel Corp. Picking up some of the slack with higher payout would be, among others, DBS and property stocks such as CapitaLand, CapitaLand Commercial Trust and Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust.

Excluding special dividends, ordinary dividends from companies in FTSE STI and MSCI Singapore are projected to be down 2.5 per cent yoy to S$15.9 billion, compared to 0.6 per cent growth in 2016.

IHS Markit covers 31 stocks from FTSE STI and MSCI Singapore. Projected dividends selected for each year are based on the dividend announcement date, so 2017 total dividends for a stock may consist of FY16 final dividend and FY17 interim dividend.
Special dividends are forecast to be down about 56 per cent yoy to S$120.8 million as Singapore Technologies Engineering opts to stick to ordinary dividend payments. The company gradually reduced yearly paid special dividends to S$155.2 million (five cents per share) last year and plans to distribute specials only when there are one-off events in future.

This leaves the number of companies that pay special dividends to two - City Developments and SPH.

Not so long ago, seven companies paid out special dividends in 2012 and 2014. But the highest special payouts in the past six years was by five companies totalling over S$1 billion in 2013, which included a bumper S$401.1 million from SPH as it listed SPH Reit.

City Developments announced two special dividends in 2017 - four cents in February and four cents in August.
"We are expecting SPH to declare a flat amount of three cents in October," said Hyeyoung Jo, IHS Markit research & analysis manager, dividend forecasting.

She also expects the final dividend to fall to six cents from eight cents. SPH is scheduled to report full year results on Oct 11. SPH declared in April an interim dividend of six cents, down from seven cents a year ago.
IHS Markit is also projecting ordinary dividends from SPH to be down 20 per cent yoy from S$239.8 million to S$192 million, added Ms Jo.

"There is a further downside risk in upcoming dividends as receding media revenue growth continues to impact the group earnings. The company's cash flow and cash equivalents have been downwards, putting additional pressure on dividend growth," said Ms Jo.

Also slashing dividends is StarHub, causing the telco sector to post a cut in aggregate dividends for the first time in five years. This is due to a dividend policy revision, effective FY17. StarHub's net profit and free cash flow in recent years have been weighed down by intensified market competition and the company decided to downgrade its annual dividend per share by 20 per cent to 16 cents from 20 cents which it had maintained since FY10.

In 2017, StarHub's total dividends are forecast to be down 15.2 per cent at S$293.8 million and the sector's total dividends are expected to fall 0.5 per cent.

Banks and telcos continue to dominate 2017 ordinary dividends, respectively accounting for 26.9 per cent and 19.8 per cent of total dividends expected for the year. Banks' dividends are set to rise 3.5 per cent, against a drop of 4.1 per cent in 2016 (minus 12.3 per cent including specials), which was primarily impacted by United Overseas Bank's policy change to keep an equal split between interim and final dividends.

This year, UOB and OCBC have declared flat dividends from the previous year while DBS decided to pay out 10 per cent higher interim dividend. Since UOB omitted special dividends in 2016, aggregate dividends from DBS surpassed its two local peers and the bank alone takes up around 10 per cent of the total dividends expected from Singapore in 2017.

Dividends from two oil and gas companies, Keppel Corp and Sembcorp Industries, have been lacklustre and the sector is projected to report the biggest cut compared to other sectors in 2017. The sector has declared 32.4 per cent lower dividends in 2017 following a 37.5 per cent decrease in the previous year.

Besides DBS, other dividend stars come from real estate. The real estate sector is projected to deliver dividend growth of 8 per cent yoy.

Six out of the nine companies in the sector are forecast to maintain flattish dividend per share (DPS) in 2017 compared to the previous year while CapitaLand Commercial Trust (CCT), CapitaLand and Ascendas Real Estate (A-Reit) are projected to deliver higher DPS, said Ms Jo.

All three companies' revenues and net property income have benefited from recent acquisitions, she noted.
A-Reit leads the sector's dividend growth and is projected to deliver the highest growth of 30.8 per cent in DPS (or 40.9 per cent in aggregate dividend) after a drop of of 33.6 per cent (or minus 25.6 per cent in aggregate dividend) a year ago. This is mainly attributable to the full-year contribution from new acquisitions in Q3 FY16 and FY17, namely the Australian logistics properties and ONE@Changi City.

Both CCT and CapitaLand have already confirmed 6.3 per cent and 11.1 per cent higher DPS respectively, equivalent to 8.4 per cent and 10.9 per cent growth in aggregate dividends. The growth is partially due to higher recurring income from CapitaGreen acquired in 2016.

Despite some dividend cuts, investors are keeping their faith with Singapore stocks.
Said Carmen Lee, head of OCBC Investment Research: "Overall, based on current prices, dividend yield for the STI is projected at about 3.4 per cent for this year and 3.5 per cent for next year.

"The STI has done well for several reasons. The key outperformers for the year included several of the big cap companies, especially those in the financial and property sectors."

This is clearly seen from the gains for the finance and property indices, she said.
The finance, Reits and real estate indices are up as much as 18 per cent for the year compared to the STI's slower 12 per cent. The STI closed at 3,218.57 last Friday.

"The STI should continue to trade towards 3,400 by year-end," said DBS Group Research in its Q4 outlook.
The reflation trade is still alive in Singapore where a synchronised pick-up in global activity is still underway, it said. "We believe the banking and property sectors should still drive index performance."

OCBC's Ms Lee said: "The recent renewed interest in the local en bloc property market has sparked interest in property trading and transactions and has also benefited listed property companies' share prices. Based on the Real Estate index, and despite recent gains, the index is still trading currently at 0.9x book value, effectively implying a discount to book value."





13 November 2017

SG Counters

*DBS
CORPORATE RESULTS
property.
- Provisioning soared 87% to $815m (2Q17: $304m) on a spike in specific allowances to the O&G support service sector.
- NPL ratio ticked up to 1.7% (3Q16: 1.3%, 2Q17: 1.5%) but capital position remained strong with Tier 1 CAR at 14.0% (3Q16: 14.4%, 2Q17: 14.4%).
- Trading at 1.32x P/B.


*Venture
- Stellar 3Q17 net profit surged 135% to $111.4m (+135%), blowing past estimates.
- Higher revenue of $1.06b (50.5%) was due to strong execution of customers' programmes and deeper collaboration with strategic clients.
- Pretax margin expanded 4.4ppt to 12.4% as there were more products that required design content.
- Cash continued to pile up giving scope for higher dividends.
- Last traded at 20.8x FY17e P/E.


- Revenue grew 3.7% to $274.7m on
- 2QFY18 net profit to $38.1m (+7.3%) missed forecasts.
*SIA Engineering
increased contribution from airframe & component overhaul and line maintenance revenue.
- But operating margin of 7.1% (-2.2ppts) was squeezed by higher staff costs.
- Last traded at 21.9x FY18e P/E.


- 3Q17 net profit tumbled 90% to $10.7m on
*OUE
lower reversal of impairment losses for OUE Twin Peaks (-86.1%).
- This dragged 9M17 net profit to $33.2m (-76.6%), meeting just 41% of FY17 street estimate.
- Revenue slumped 56.6% to $181.9m on weaker development income (-86.9%) following completion of Crowne Plaza Changi Airport Extension and fewer unit sales at OUE Twin Peaks.
- Gross margin expanded to 38.6% (+5.6ppt) on a shift in sales mix.
- Bottom line was further weighed by increased net finance expenses (+19.8%) and a jump in non-controlling interests (+28.2%).
- NAV/share at $4.38.


*Chip Eng Seng
- 3Q17 net profit surged 145.8% to $14m, mainly boosted by a disposal gain from of 420 St Kilda Road in Melbourne, Australia, for $13.4m.
- Revenue jumped 37.8% to $209.2m on jump in contributions from property developments (+114.7%) and hospitality (+47.6%), but partly weighed by construction (-31.9%) and property investments (-7.7%).
- Gross margin dipped 1ppt to 16.8% on the shift in sales mix.
- Bottom line was partly weighed by increased administrative expenses (+36.1%) arising from pre-operating expenses for Grand Park Kodhipparu Maldives, depreciation charges and higher staff costs.
- Trades at 17.4x forward P/E.


- Declared interim DPS to 1¢ (3Q16:
- Bottom line was partly supported by lower interest costs (-25.8%) and distribution & selling (-7.1%) expenses, but pared by a swing into associate/ JV loss to $0.02m (3Q16: $0.6m profit).
- Gross margin slipped 1.1ppt to 55.2% on a change in sales mix.
- Revenue slipped 2% to $154.3m on weakness across bakery (-1.7%), food atrium (-4.5%), F&B incubator 4orth (-9.8%) and others (-2.5%), while restaurant takings improved 0.9%.
- 3Q17 results missed despite a 22.2% jump in net profit to $4m.
*Breadtalk
nil).
-
Currently
trades at 23.8x forward P/E.

- Gross margin expanded 3.6ppt to 7.4% on better margins from the processing segment and contribution from new
- For the quarter, revenue surged 157.7% to US$482.1m on improved rubber prices and higher sales volume from existing and newly-acquired operations, namely Sinochem and GMG Global.
- 3Q17 turned around to net profit of US$7.3m (3Q16 US$12.1m loss), bringing 9M17 net profit to US$20.1m (9M16: $26.7m loss).
*Halcyon Agri
acquisitions, but was partially offset by margin compression in the distribution segment.
- Bottom line was supported by
associate profit of $2.6m (3Q16: nil
).
- Last traded at 5.5x trailing P/E.


- 3Q17 reversed into
*Rowsley
net loss of $9.8m (3Q16: $5.4m profit) due to a $7.9m fair value loss stemming from an acquisition which saw its consideration upwardly revised, and absence of $7.2m revaluation gain from a subsidiary.
- Revenue rose 6% to $26.2m, mainly contributed by Squire Mech, an associate turned subsidiary in Aug '16, and new acquisitions AC Consortium, and Ariva Hospitality.
- Post-adjustment of one-off items, EBITDA margin shrank 4.3ppt to 5.1% upon consolidation of Squire Mech, lower wage reimbursement from customers and higher project expenses.
- Net gearing crept higher to 0.23x from 0.21x in Jun '17.
- NAV/share at $0.0846.


POSITIVE NEWS
*Metro Holdings
- Existing 90:10 JV with Lee Kim Tah Group has signed a master agreement with PT. Trans Corpora, to develop, market and sell five 32-storey residential towers in Bekasi, Jakarta, Indonesia.
- Total investment value will be at Rp1,987b ($200.4m).
- The residential towers are part of Trans Corpora's mixed development Trans Park Bekasi on a 4.5-ha site, which also comprises a hotel, school, office building and a Transmart mall.
- This allows Metro to expand beyond retail department store operations to include its core property business in Indonesia.


-
- The deal includes a net profit guarantee of RM4.5m for FY18.
- To acquire Eastern Press, a Malaysian printer and supplier of packaging materials, for RM46.3m.
*Top Glove
Acquisition will help improve its supply chain for better costs and quality control.

- Disposing entire 49% stake in Triumph Alliance to Prime Asia Corp for US$10m, which includes a repayment of
*Noble
NEGATIVE NEWS
loan owed to Noble.
- The consideration in markedly below the JV's book value of US$44m, and hence will lead to an impairment loss.


*Dukang Distillers
- Warned of significantly lower 1QFY18 revenue and earnings.
- The negative profit alert was due to an inventory build-up at the distributors following a previous sales promotion for baijiu products.


*Profit warnings
- Tat Hong
- A-Sonic


NEUTRAL NEWS
*Frasers Centrepoint
- Hospitality arm marked the opening of a 354-unit Modena By Fraser Changsha in Hunan, China.
- The serviced residence is one of 14 properties slated to open over the next four years.
- The group currently has a global portfolio of 148 properties with 23,600 units.


- Land site is a 462sqm freehold property that is zoned residential with commercial at
- Exercised an option to purchase a vacant land along Tessensohn Road in Singapore for $14.5m.
*Oxley
1st storey.
- Trading at 11.6x forward P/E.


- The price translates to ~$2,080
- To acquire another 3.33%/ 5.49% in Perennial Chinatown Point for $5.1m/ $8.5m.
*SPH/ Perennial
psf NLA.
- The deal will raise SPH/ Perennial's stakes to 30.68%/ 50.64%.


- Secured a contract for the construction of one service vessel for integrated fish-farming group
*Vard
Midt-Norsk Havbruk in Norway.
- The vessel is slated to deliver by 2Q18.
- Trading at 0.8x P/B.


*Keppel T&T
- 70:30 JV with Keppel Land partnered Singapore Internet Exchange (SGIX) to enhance network connectivity in Singapore.
- The partnership increases SGIX Internet peering points in Singapore to four, boosting its service coverage across the country.
- Customers of Keppel Data Centres that connect to SGIX stand to enjoy reduced latency and lower operating costs from the streamlining of Internet connections. 


*Cogent
- Entered into a Deed of Gift with its chairman to transfer his rights, title and interest in certain patents relating to the frame structure for a multi-level container handling and storage facility.


-
*Yoma
Proposed placement of 155m new shares (8.9% share capital) at $0.53 each to placement agent CLSA and RHB Securities.
- Net proceeds of $80.9m earmarked to fund growth and expansion for its real estate division (50%), with the remainder for the automotive and heavy equipment divisions, consumer and others.


- The properties have a combined strata floor area of 128,000
- Golden Bay owns 59 strata lots, of which 21 are shops and 38 are offices, located at Orchard Tower and 1 Claymore Drive in Singapore.
- Entered into a conditional agreement to buy property investment firm Golden Bay Realty for $162m.
*Hiap Hoe
sf and NLA of 89,000 sf.
- The acquisition will expand the group's property investment portfolio and strengthen its recurrent income stream.
- Trades at 8.2x trailing P/E.


- The 999-year property with
- To purchase a 3-storey conservation commercial shophouse for $26.5m.
*Top Global
gfa of 10,027 sf will be enhanced and leased to hostel operator 5Footway Founders.


10 October 2017

A Thank you letter from my client!














Sharing is an altruistic act. With or without risks, altruism is a helping behaviour that is motivated only by the desire to relieve suffering, and without any anticipation of reward to come.

Blog, free seminars, networking, free coaching, I have done it all. Helping everyone, one at a time, without any anticipation of reward to come. This is the greatest satisfaction in trading and investing.

:)



08 October 2017

How to Handle and Trade with Private Information?


Many times friends and clients ask me what is the difference between private and public information. They are confused and unclear, not able to discern a clear distinct difference between the 2.

In this video, Clemen Chiang explains the definition between both. It is the same reason why I always urge my friends, clients and followers to share information together. Winning alone is boring. Winning together helps to increase the chances of winning and the size of winning.

And this is why during my free time, I give FREE seminars and started this blog.

Have a look at the video and hope that this sharing gives you a more detailed understanding.




06 October 2017

WHAT'S BITCOIN AND THE BLOCKCHAIN?

WHAT'S BITCOIN AND THE BLOCKCHAIN?



Bitcoin is the world's first completely decentralized digital currency, also known as a cryptocurrency. Bitcoin introduced a technology called a blockchain, which is a peer-to-peer distributed ledger of timestamped transactions.

Before the invention of Bitcoin, ledgers had to be maintained by central authorities like banks, which kept a single authoritative copy of the ledger. This meant that users that relied on a ledger had to trust the central authority.

Bitcoin's use of a blockchain eliminates the need for central authorities and the need to trust them. It does this by allowing each user of the system to maintain their own copy of the ledger and keeping all copies of the ledger verifiably synchronized through a consensus algorithm.
Bitcoin is designed to allow its users to hold, send, and receive money online, but distributed ledgers can be used to do much more, including clearing and settlement of digital asset trading, provisining of identity, and distributed computing—all without the need for central intermediaries. The 10-minute video that follows presents plain English explanation of these concepts and why they have the potential to change the world.
And this short plain-English backgrounder explains the basic concepts in simple to understand terms.

SOME ADVANCED CONCEPTS

Now that you have the basics, you can delve a bit more in-depth into how the technology works and what it can do. Below are links to short, plain-language explainers covering some of the key concepts you'll need to know before you can understand the policy implications. And BTW, we have many more plain-language explainers on host of related concepts.
If you want to take a deep dive on the technology and what it means for the world, we recommend a great book by two Wall Street Journal reporters, The Age of Cryptocurrency: How Bitcoin and the Blockchain Are Challenging the Global Economic Order by Paul Vigna & Michael J. Casey. And for an even deeper dive into the distinction between open and closed blockchain technologies and why open networks are essential for several exciting use cases, read our report, Open Matters.

HOW DOES POLICY AND REGULATION FIT IN?

Traditional ledgers have centralized ledger-keepers (like banks), so it's clear who are the responsible and regulated parties. But because open and decentralized blockchains like Bitcoin have no central operators (just like the internet itself), figuring out who is regulated, if anyone, requires deeper analysis. And because traditional concepts like "custody of funds" take on new meaning given technologies like multi-sig, what the technology allows us to do has outpaced what the law has anticipated, so new policy thinking is in order.
Here are two resources that we recommend to get you up to speed on the technology and the policy questions it raises:
  • Is Bitcoin Regulated?
    This short backgrounder explains that while the technology itself can't really be regulated, its users are certainly subject to many different kinds of regulation.
  • Bitcoin: A Primer for Policymakers
    This monograph by Jerry Brito & Andrea Castillo presents a high-level overview of the technology and the regulations its use implicates.

WHAT ARE THE REGULATORY ISSUES?

The top areas of concern for regulators are:
  • Consumer protection
  • Financial surveillance and anti-money-laundering
  • Securities and commodities regulation
  • Tax compliance
  • Privacy and identity

To start mining Bitcoins, or to give it a shot, go to for your FREE account:

05 October 2017

Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency Mining, and You

There is a cryptocurrency craze going on. Everyone is excited, fund houses are setting up new departments, countries setting up think tanks to consider all the possibilities.

And with all the hype around, the uninitiated will ask the eventual question: Is this a revolution, or is this just a hype?

To answer the above, one must understand the fundamentals of cryptocurrency.

Fiat currency

The cash one has in the wallet, the amount balance in the bank account, fixed deposit certificates, all of these are fiat money. It is an inconvertible paper money made legal tender by a government decree.

Fiat money is a centralised system where central bankers can decide to print more money, change the currency and etc. Over the years, people are disappointed and afraid of economic conditions such as inflation, recession, or worse, stagflation. There was a need for a certain form of currency that is independent yet controlled so that its value will not be eroded.

First Cryptocurrency: Bitcoin

Bitcoin is the most popular cryptocurrency, simply because it was first started about 10+  years ago. It's the first cryptocurrency, first of its kind, grandfather of all cryptos.

Bitcoin is not the only crypto, there are almost 800+ other cryptos. Using stocks as an analogy, bitcoin will be like the bluechip stock, and there are other cryptos which probably like mid or small-cap counters.

Fiat currency VS Cryptocurrency

Putting 2 together, it's something like paper letters vs emails. Both are fundamentally similar, but in a different medium. There is a certain supply limit to it and based on its algorithm no new cryptocurrency can be created till it is validated by the entire network. The mentioned network is the entire network computation power contributed by everyone all around the world.

In short, the serial number on the fiat money is the same as crypto currency.

Cryptocurrency Mining

Just like digging for gold, as one digs further, it gets tougher. Cryptocurrency mining has this challenge too. As the mining computers pools in resources to mine for coins, it gets tougher over time, and more time required to process the subsequent coins. When the coins are found, it will be transferred to a wallet to hold the coins. The coins will then belong to the miner and it can be used for spending or investing.

Using a spare phone or a spare computer that is unused, you can change it into a mining rig.

I have recently signed up with MinerGate and it's very straightforward. No charges or whatsoever.

Just sign up, install the program on your computer and start mining. It takes a while, but that's what mining is all about. For faster mining, there are server rentals available too.

So I'm sharing my code for all keen readers who want to get a bit of digital cash while it is still early. Plus with hands-on experience, it accelerates learning too.

Happy Mining.



 Bitcoin Mining





19 September 2017

S$10 NETT TRADING FEE for CONTRA TRADING!



Additional points to note:

  1. per trade will be S$10 min or 0.12%, which ever is higher
  2. Contra trading is ALLOWED on UOBKH
  3. No min trades required.
  4. Cash upfront before trading
  5. Only for SG stocks




Interested parties please drop me a message. 


My team will send the forms to you.


Thank you

14 September 2017

FYI: Challenges Of The Singapore Stockbroking Industry

I found the article below by chance.

To a certain extent, I do agree with most of the points. The current client relationship wants nothing but low trading fees. Of which, this is perfectly understandable. Mind you, I want low fee for my trades, who doesn't? In fact, as a broker myself, I am expected to pay for trading fees too (in case you thought otherwise)

Now for brokerage houses to survive in a low revenue and fixed cost environment, other instruments are introduced. This includes custody shares and CFDs. Custody shares allow the company to trade against the client. And as a result, prices are depressed and clients fail to profit effectively. Thus they seek to lower trading cost by always opting for custody shares. 

It is a vicious cycle.

Suggested solution?

In every business model, it has to have a positive effect on every party, creating a positive cycle, bringing everyone forward.

A fixed brokerage rate maybe? Yet, the backlash of implementing the fixed brokerage rate may possibly drive investors away from SG market. Or maybe not.

Well, thank god I am a salaried stockbroker.




Taken from:
 http://www.remisiers.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1285:challenges-of-the-singapore-stock-broking-industry&catid=4:forum&Itemid=13

Recently, The Economist highlights an important trend that all in the financial services industry must take note if they expect to be around in even five years - the use of technology in the industry. In the local stock broking context, the invasion of borderless internet trading platforms would count as one. Besides the technology threat, there are also other challenges our local stock broking industry faces. I will surmise each of them as below:

1. Competition from non-SGX member internet trading platforms 
Our local stock-broking houses were slow in reacting to the threats posed by such foreign internet trading platforms who are not SGX members. Not only are these foreign internet platforms packed with features that our local stock-broking houses do not have, they also charge lower commission rates. It is only in the last few years that member stock-broking houses are spending money on improving their trading platform capabilities, whereas these competitive internet trading platforms had capabilities like stop-loss, trailing stop-loss etc, a decade ago. Furthermore, users can also trade soft & hard commodities, indices, forex, CFD, options - all on one platform. If they have to choose, our younger tech-savyy investors will likely choose such a more capable trading platform. Advisory trading (phone calling your stock-broker) will be used by the older generation who are less tech-savvy, and those who are too busy to key in their own trades. Over time, if our member stock broking houses do not "catch-up" on improving their trading platform to be on par, or even surpass that of these competitive trading platforms, we will all (both member stock-broking houses and their remisiers) lose out. The only solution has to be a holistic one involving all stakeholders of the industry - the SGX, the Government and the investors, both institutional and retail.

So, what should be the position of SGX, MAS and SIAS with regards to such non-SGX member internet trading platforms? It is a difficult position that SGX has, in that it cannot be seen to be stifling Singapore as a financial centre. With the current internet-age, it would indeed be a challenge and near impossible for SGX to keep out such internet trading platforms. The most effective way would be for SGX to work together with member broking houses to introduce trading platforms with better capabilities, and with more products like stock options & indices, and perhaps even commodities and forex. This will make their trading platforms more interesting to local investors and not lose out to the foreign competition. With trading platforms of better capabilities, member broking houses can, and should, compete for international business from other countries, just like what these alternative internet trading platforms are doing in Singapore. This will then ensure the survival of, especially, the local stock broking houses.

Regardless of the fact that we want to make Singapore a vibrant regional financial hub, it is important for MAS to ensure sufficient policing so that our Singaporean investors do not fall into any scams by rogue internet trading platforms. For the retail investors, SIAS needs to move beyond its role as champion to do some due diligence and intelligence work to sieve out and warn retail investors of any potential rogue internet trading platforms.

2. Singapore stock market vs Foreign stock market
If you are trading in the US market, you would have noticed the flurry of activity in this market. There is no denying that the dynamism of foreign markets, like the US, or HK (which has the hinterland support of China), surpasses our Singapore market. With due respect to the Singapore companies listed on SGX, it is sad to say that none of these companies show the promise of innovation that US companies can. Singapore companies only grow organically or geographically, but none like the types of Apple or Microsoft, or recently Tesla, where their stock prices can grow multi-fold due to the value-added of their product innovation. Take Apple for example. During May/June 2007, it was about USD80. It then grew to nearly USD700 in June 2014. In June 2014, it exercised a stock-split of 1 into 7, which brought it to just above USD90. It has now gone up to about USD129. That is a 9 fold increase over a period of 8 years. Clients finding the Singapore market less exciting, are gradually moving to foreign markets, but unfortunately, with more of them slowly shifting to the use of the more capable foreign internet trading platforms mentioned above.
SGX cannot depend on the local stock investing community to attract premium companies to list in Singapore as this community is too small to have any impact. It has to find ways to make the Singapore listed companies accessible to a bigger population of investors worldwide, and not just within Singapore. With a bigger net cast, hopefully there will be more vibrancy, and therefore will attract better quality corporate listings. Otherwise, we will end up in a vicious cycle of low vibrancy, and therefore lower quality corporate listing, and vice-versa. The current initiative by SGX to link up with Taiwan, Japan, and rumoured talks of link up with the Chinese Exchanges, should hopefully move us in this positive direction.

3. Competition of brokerage fees from foreign markets
Brokerage fees in USA are generally lower than ours, and in some cases are fixed ($) on a per trade basis. This encourages big volume trading unlike percentage (%) based brokerage that is the norm in Singapore, where the higher the volume traded, higher is the brokerage cost. But of course, Singapore being a smaller market, it would be unwise for us to follow a fixed value ($) brokerage system as this will lead to lower revenue for the local broking fraternity. Nonetheless, the US brokerage system will certainly attract Singapore investors away from our local market which is seen as less dynamic and with less potential "multi-bagger" stocks. This shift is further aided by the borderless foreign internet trading platforms, together with their lower commission rate. Such a self-perpetuating situation will become worse, unless we break the vicious cycle of low vibrancy as stated in point 2 above. However, our top priority now should not be to implement a similar type of brokerage system as the USA. Only after we are able to attract more transaction volume into our Stock Echange should we then be able to consider fixed value ($) brokerage system.

4. Unhealthy competition between local broking houses
While in the past, the fixed 1% brokerage fee was seen as unduly high, the current, supposedly, market dynamics of competitive brokerage fees is certainly unhealthy for the industry. Local broking houses and remisiers undercut each other. In the end, everybody loses. Revenue for the brokerage houses and remisiers is reduced. Demanding small clients may not get the service they want if the motivation of a remisier is to balance the time he has to spend on such clients versus the returns. The competition is not only between the broking houses, but sometimes also amongst remisiers of the same broking house. This can happen during roadshows, where a client may not reveal immediately that they already have a broker with the same broking house. In order to gain business, the remisier at the roadshow may unwittingly promise a lower commission, thus causing much unhappiness with the client who may think that his/her current broker has not been honest. Most clients expect their brokers to give them the lowest commission rate out-right, not knowing that they may have to meet certain volume criteria before such a low rate can be granted. For the local broking industry to survive, this kind of unhealthy competition has to stop. All stakeholders have to sit down and thrash out a scheme of fixed brokerage rate (%) that is fair to both investors and the stock-brokers. This should certainly not be seen as price-fixing as there are precedents in other cases/industries.

5. Conclusion
The Singapore stock broking industry is certainly facing many challenges. I would not venture to say that the industry has to innovate or reinvent itself, but rather it is downright very practical things that has to be done by the various responsible parties. Instead of working independently within their narrow scope of self-interest, all concerned parties have to work in consultation and in synergy of each other. If all parties are not united in the objective of improving the situation, the ultimate loser will be the Singapore stock-broking industry and its prominence in Asia, or even in S.E. Asia. China (together with Hong Kong) is already coming up very fast. Indonesia, with a domestic base of 260 million people, can outdo us in S.E. Asia if they put their act together better than us.

SGX has to push and take the lead in all the actions below:

i) Member (especially the local ones) stock broking houses has to invest on improving on the capabilities of their internet trading platforms to ensure that the tech-savvy younger generation investors do not move away to the more attractive non-SGX member foreign internet trading platforms. With their improved trading platforms, the local broking houses should then explore the possibility of attracting overseas investors to trade in the Singapore stock market.

ii) SGX should explore to include more products that can be traded via the member broking houses' trading platform, e.g. stock options, indices, and possibly commodities futures and forex.

iii) SGX has to work hard on improving the vibrancy of our Singapore stock market through links with other regional and foreign stock exchanges. SGX and the member stock broking houses should also work towards making it easy and simple for overseas investors to trade in our Singapore stocks.

iv) All stakeholders should sit down to thrash out a fixed brokerage (%) scheme which would be fair to both investors and stock-brokers, and which would prevent the unhealthy undercutting. The value-add of remisiers has to be recognised as they not only act as "no basic salary" sales-force, but also bear complete risk of the clients that they acquired. Although there are efforts by some broking houses to introduce cash-deposit trading, a lot of clients still prefer to keep money in their own hands. The contra-players would also not see the advantage of depositing their money with the broking houses. In large countries like China or the USA, it may perhaps make sense to have cash-deposit trading as the population mobility is high, and the risk of bad-debts from open-credit trading in a large continent will be too high, but not in Singapore. The undercutting of commission resulted in very thin commission that has to be shared 60:40 between broking house and remisier respectively. This does not commensurate with the financial resources that the broking house needs for rentals, backroom support, trading platform improvements etc.It also does not commensurate with the high risk that remisiers have to bear in terms of bad-debts. We should unite to gain back our share lost to external forces, but sadly it seems that we are competing even more amongst ourselves for the slowly shrinking piece of cake taken away by such external forces.

NB: The opinion expressed here is the personal opinion of the author, and any mistake made is solely that of the author, and not that of the SRS or its Ex-Co.

05 September 2017

NetLink NBN Trust (NetLink SP)


SP : NetLink NBN Trust (NetLink SP) : Unassailable Foundation Of Next Gen NBN
 





INITIATE COVERAGE

NetLink NBN Trust (NetLink SP)

Buy | Price/Tgt: S$0.805/S$0.93 | Mkt Cap: S$3,137.1m



Unassailable Foundation Of Next Gen NBN

NetLink NBN Trust operates the only passive fibre infrastructure to provide wholesale dark fibre services for ultra-high-speed fibre connections in SIngapore. It has a dominant market share of 81.7% for residential and 30.8% for non-residential connections, where growth is projected at 5-year CAGR of 7.2% and 10.1% respectively for 2016-21. The Smart Nation initiative also provides numerous opportunities for growth. Initiate coverage with BUY. Target price: S$0.93.

·        Futile to replicate NetLink’s extensive passive infrastructure. NetLink NBN Trust (NetLink) is the sole network company for Next Gen NBN. Its extensive nationwide coverage acts as a barrier to entry. To date, NetLink has received aggregate grants of S$732m for the construction of passive fibre infrastructure. Without similar support from the government, it would be almost impossible for any potential competitor to provide a viable alternative or meet current regulated wholesale pricing.

·        Defensive and regulated cash flows. NetLink possesses resilient, predicatable, transparent and regulated revenue streams. Competition or churn among retail service providers does not affect the number of fibre connections provided by NetLink. NetLink’s customers are established players in the telecommunications industry in Singapore.
·        Growth from Smart Nation initiative. The Smart Nation platform is a government initiative to build a pervasive network of sensors and probes deployed to collect real-time environmental information, process it and share it among government agencies and private sector participants. Smart Nation would have a positive impact on demand for NetLink’s NBAP connections.

·        Growth propelled by migration from ADSL and HFC to fibre connections. Independent industry consultant Media Partners Asia (MPA) estimated the penetration for legacy ADSL and HFC-based connections at 17.9% as of Mar 17. MPA expects all ADSL subscribers to migrate to fibre connections by Dec 19, and HFC-based services to cease by Dec 21. As such, residential fibre broadband subscribers are projected to increase at a 5-year CAGR of 7.2% in 2016-21.

·        SMEs drive demand for non-residential connections. Growth drivers for the non-residential segment include SMEs and cloud-based applications. To encourage the adoption of fibre broadband among SMEs, the government has provided a 50% subsidy capped at S$120/month for up to 24 months for SMEs subscribing to fibre broadband plans with speeds of at least 100Mbps. MPA projects non-residential fibre broadband subscribers to grow at a 5-year CAGR of 10.1% in 2016-21.

·        Initiate coverage with BUY. Our target price of S$0.93 is based on DCF methodology (cost of equity: 6.5%, terminal growth: 2.0%). The stock provides attractive distribution yield of 5.2% (annualised) and 6.0% for FY18 and FY19 respectively.
//amazon